Technology complements the facilitator
The collective intelligence platform does not replace live dialogue. It adds a space for anonymous idea generation and evaluation that a facilitator can integrate before, during, or after a session.
This catalog is for facilitators, consultants, and change architects who want to complement live group work with structured collective decidement.
Project task: Contribute ideas identifying the areas, processes or relationships where internal tension is greatest.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on topics that employees tend to avoid, soften or leave unspoken.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on situations where people appear to be discussing the same issue but do not actually understand one another.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on problems or topics that are repeatedly postponed or never fully articulated.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying where the organization's official narrative differs most from daily reality.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas that help distinguish surface-level obstacles from deeper organizational constraints.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions that should not yet be moved into solution-finding.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on areas where the organization has developed a sufficiently clear understanding of the problem.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on topics that would benefit from being separated into distinct collective decidement spaces.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions whose combination in a single format would create more confusion than value.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying the principal lines along which views diverge.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions around which distinct camps form most clearly.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions where most people quietly agree even though that agreement has not been made explicit.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the arguments that most influence people's evaluations and choices.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on topics and formulations that may lead people to withdraw, resist or become more defensive.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions for which an anonymous collective decidement environment would be more useful than live discussion.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions that first require direct group engagement in a facilitated setting.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the most effective sequencing and combination of live sessions and collective decidement stages.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on topics that should be anonymously clarified and divided into distinct questions or projects before the meeting.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on areas where anonymous evaluation and structured idea collection could reduce domination, repetition or disorder.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying the most important insights that emerged during the session.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on topics that should become standalone collective decidement projects.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on questions for which the session did not provide sufficient clarity or evidence.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on areas that require additional diagnosis or deeper examination.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying statements, directions or emerging solutions that warrant further scrutiny.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the client's implicit expectations behind the formally stated objectives.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on psychological, cultural or structural barriers to open discussion.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on entrenched narratives that prevent new perspectives and solutions from emerging.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying phenomena that are personalized instead of understood as structural.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on limited-scope, high-impact projects suitable as an initial intervention for this organization.
Discuss this project →The collective intelligence platform does not replace live dialogue. It adds a space for anonymous idea generation and evaluation that a facilitator can integrate before, during, or after a session.
The practical minimum for one problem area is eight participants with relevant knowledge. The method is most reliable with 15–20 or more people whose experience and expertise complement one another.
In a short conversation, we can assess the situation, identify the right participant group, and determine how the project fits into a broader decidement sequence.