The catalog helps identify a starting point
The project questions do not promise a predetermined answer. They precisely define a shared challenge that requires knowledge distributed across different parts of the organization.
A collection of focused projects for discovering meaningful opportunities, diversifying ideas, evaluating innovation concepts, and scaling change. Each project activates collective intelligence across the organization and its ecosystem so that innovation and transformation decisions are grounded in real needs, evidence, and implementation conditions.
Project task: Contribute ideas on problems experienced by different employees, customers, partners, or other stakeholders whose reach and impact justify the search for a new solution.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on improvised tools, workarounds, or emerging practices that reveal an important unmet need and a possible direction for a solution.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on situations where people's expectations, working environments, or technological possibilities are changing faster than existing solutions.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on resources already present in the organization or its ecosystem whose new combination could provide the basis for a useful solution.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on alternative ways to define the same problem, revealing different causes, boundaries, participants, or opportunities to create value.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on alternative solution principles without prematurely converging on one technology, product, or operating model.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the people, experiences, and expertise that could reveal overlooked needs, constraints, or opportunities.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas identifying explicit and unspoken assumptions that limit the range of concepts and preserve established models.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on elements from different proposals that, when combined, would better address need, feasibility, and value creation.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on how time, budget, regulatory, infrastructure, or other constraints could help shape a clearer and more original solution.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on criteria for transparently comparing concepts by value, feasibility, impact, and risk.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on who would gain the most, who would bear costs or risks, and whose experience is essential to a fair assessment.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on assumptions and unknowns most likely to change the decision to continue, revise, or stop developing the concept.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute reasoned ideas for comparing alternatives by expected benefit, required effort, and their ability to produce decision-relevant knowledge.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the evidence behind each proposal, its remaining gaps, and the best next decision in the context of the full innovation portfolio.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the simplest prototype format, target situation, and interaction that would provide sufficient evidence about the critical assumption.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on behavioral, outcome, experience, and implementation data, as well as evaluation criteria to establish before the pilot begins.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on participant groups, environments, and exceptional circumstances without which the findings would be too narrow or misleading.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on unusual, demanding, or higher-risk situations in which the solution's limits need to become visible before broader deployment.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas interpreting the experiences of different participants and the collected data against decision criteria agreed in advance.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on task characteristics, exceptions, risks, and the value of human judgment so the boundaries of technology use can be set responsibly.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on disconnected data, repeated actions, and interoperability gaps visible in the daily work of different users.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on concrete needs, users, value, and available data that distinguish meaningful use cases from technology-led assumptions.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on safeguards, explainability, oversight, and accountability boundaries that matter to different groups.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on necessary changes to tasks, roles, information flows, and human-technology interaction—not merely the technical installation of a tool.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on funding, ownership, process, technology, or stakeholder barriers that prevent an evidence-backed solution from becoming standard practice.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on differences among units, regions, or user groups that would keep an unchanged solution from producing the expected result.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on each group's influence, motivations, knowledge, and conditions for active participation or resistance.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on essential solution principles, quality boundaries, and local discretion needed across different implementation settings.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on changes in behavior, outcomes, usage, and experience worth monitoring so the transformation can be reinforced or corrected in time.
Discuss this project →The project questions do not promise a predetermined answer. They precisely define a shared challenge that requires knowledge distributed across different parts of the organization.
The practical minimum for one problem area is eight participants with relevant knowledge. The method is most reliable with 15–20 or more people whose experience and expertise complement one another.
In a short conversation, we can assess the situation, identify the right participant group, and determine how the project fits into a broader decision-making sequence.